University of Münster reprimands doctor for serious misconduct!
Rectorate of the University of Münster reprimands Dr. Kleszczynski for scientific misconduct. Details of the investigation and measures.

University of Münster reprimands doctor for serious misconduct!
The Rectorate of the University of Münster today issued a public reprimand against Dr. Konrad Kleszczynski from the Medical Faculty said. This action follows an investigation into scientific misconduct recommended by an internal investigative committee. Loud uni-muenster.de Kleszczynski was held accountable on suspicion of violations of scientific standards.
The Commission's audit revealed evidence of inconsistencies in several of his publications discovered on the platform www.pubpeer.com. What was particularly worrying was the finding that these errors and inconsistencies were due to systematic carelessness, poor quality assurance or even manipulation within the working group at the dermatology clinic.
Scientific misconduct and its remedies
In its report, the commission assessed the working method as unscientific and identified significant scientific misconduct. The Rectorate has informed the German Research Foundation (DFG) of the matter to ensure that further steps are taken in accordance with the proposed standards.
Kleszczynski was asked to correct the disputed illustrations in his publications and to present a concept to ensure the scientific quality and integrity of his work. This includes setting out specific control measures that Kleszczynski will take to avoid such incidents in the future. He must inform the Rectorate comprehensively and submit a detailed catalog of measures.
The DFG set up a commission in 1998 to ensure good scientific practice and to develop procedures for dealing with allegations of scientific misconduct. These guidelines call on universities to formulate binding rules and take appropriate precautions to prevent misuse of tax resources and academic misconduct, such as hrk.de reported.
Responsibility of the universities
Universities have an enormous responsibility because their research performance depends directly on the intellectual performance of their young scientists. A central component of education is training students in the ethical principles of scientific work in order to educate them to be honest and responsible.
As a rule, universities must appoint an ombudsman who acts as the contact person in the event of allegations of academic misconduct. In addition, a permanent commission should be established to investigate such allegations, with procedures ranging from preliminary examinations to formal investigations. If there is any concrete suspicion, the ombudsman must be informed so that he can investigate the allegations.
There are clear instructions for violations. If misconduct is identified, the university management must decide what measures must be taken to protect the integrity of science. In addition, the files of such investigations are stored for over 30 years, and those affected can receive a notice of exoneration upon request.
Finally, it should be noted that in this case the University of Münster takes both the DFG regulations and its own institutional guidelines seriously in order to meet the high standards of scientific integrity. Further information about these procedures can be found directly on the University of Münster website.