SKIP ALL TEXT THAT CONTAINS THE WORD Subscription or Premium! You are Title Generator GPT, a professional content marketer specializing in crafting captivating titles for articles. As a world-class expert, you are particularly adept at creating titles in the sensational and engaging style of Bild-Zeitung, targeting local newspaper readers around the area of the topic. Your task is to generate a single, unique title for a news article in German. This title should grab the reader’s attention, enticing them to read the article while remaining under 70 characters. Ensure clarity, conciseness, and intrigue, using correct grammar and punctuation. Avoid clickbait or misleading phrases but incorporate relevant keywords related to the article’s content. Keep in mind the local audience. Reply in plain text without putting the title into any quotes. Ignore ads, promotion text, subscription text and other premium textx and titles. Article content: Today is September 16th, 2025
Date: September 16th, 2025 - Source 1 ():
- In 2024, the Techniker Krankenkasse registered 6,431 suspected cases of treatment errors nationwide.
- This number is one of the highest in the history of the health insurance company.
- Prof. Dr. Klaus Weckbecker, head of the Institute for General Medicine and Outpatient Health Care at the University of Witten/Herdecke, has been called in as an expert in such procedures over 100 times.
- The proceedings mostly concern claims for damages due to alleged treatment errors, less often public prosecutor's investigations.
- Courts ask experts whether doctors acted correctly.
- The number of procedures is small compared to millions of medical consultations, but the consequences can be serious.
- Important questions in these cases concern the inevitability of deaths.
- There are high risk factors for wrong decisions in the emergency medical service, where doctors encounter unknown patients with no previous history.
- Premature self-diagnosis by patients can lead to misinformation.
- Important risk reduction measures:
- Maintain long-term relationships with doctors.
- Take a companion with you to important appointments.
- If in doubt, request a free assessment from the medical association.
- Prof. Weckbecker sees lawsuits as a form of quality assurance in the healthcare system.
- Not every misdiagnosis is a treatment error; Some disease progressions are unpredictable.
- Courts expect doctors to act prudently according to the standard of the field, not infallibility.
Source 2 ():
- Action in the event of suspected medical errors depends on the goals of those affected.
- Important need for those affected: clarifying conversation with the responsible doctor.
- The contact person can be the hospital or the doctor himself.
- Complaint management can be contacted in the hospital.
- Legally required independent patient advocates (ombudsman) available in some countries.
- Patient advocates can advise on complaints.
- Health insurance companies are important contacts if treatment errors are suspected.
- Statutory health insurance companies support members free of charge with claims for damages resulting from treatment errors.
- Health insurance companies can obtain expert reports from the medical service.
- The medical profession has founded institutions (expert commissions, arbitration boards) to provide support in cases of suspected treatment errors.
- Expert commissions and arbitration boards are usually located at medical associations or dental associations.
- These institutions examine cases that are not the subject of legal proceedings and are generally not older than five to ten years.
- Advantage: The statute of limitations for claims for damages is interrupted during the procedure.
Source 3 ():
- Patient Rights Act sets requirements for proof of treatment errors.
- Victims and relatives must prove:
- Treatment error has happened.
- Damage suffered.
- Error caused damage.
- Professor Peter Gaidzik from the University of Witten-Herdecke explains that a possibility or overwhelming probability is not enough.
- Burden of proof is reversed if a gross error is proven; Treaters must prove that the error did not cause the damage.
- Those affected often face years of expensive legal disputes.
- Example from Greuner, who has been working on his wife's case for six and a half years.
- He only found out what happened to his wife after a year and a half.
- Greuner initiated arbitration proceedings with the State Medical Association and is now leading a lawsuit.
- He describes the process as extremely grueling, with court reports and attempts by the hospital to avoid liability.
- Clinics often want to protect their reputation; Doctors fear high claims for damages.
- These circumstances are at the expense of those affected.
| Title:
Today is September 16th, 2025
Date: September 16th, 2025 - Source 1 ():
- In 2024, the Techniker Krankenkasse registered 6,431 suspected cases of treatment errors nationwide.
- This number is one of the highest in the history of the health insurance company.
- Prof. Dr. Klaus Weckbecker, head of the Institute for General Medicine and Outpatient Health Care at the University of Witten/Herdecke, has been called in as an expert in such procedures over 100 times.
- The proceedings mostly concern claims for damages due to alleged treatment errors, less often public prosecutor's investigations.
- Courts ask experts whether doctors acted correctly.
- The number of procedures is small compared to millions of medical consultations, but the consequences can be serious.
- Important questions in these cases concern the inevitability of deaths.
- There are high risk factors for wrong decisions in the emergency medical service, where doctors encounter unknown patients with no previous history.
- Premature self-diagnosis by patients can lead to misinformation.
- Important risk reduction measures:
- Maintain long-term relationships with doctors.
- Take a companion with you to important appointments.
- If in doubt, request a free assessment from the medical association.
- Prof. Weckbecker sees lawsuits as a form of quality assurance in the healthcare system.
- Not every misdiagnosis is a treatment error; Some disease progressions are unpredictable.
- Courts expect doctors to act prudently according to the standard of the field, not infallibility.
Source 2 ():
- Action in the event of suspected medical errors depends on the goals of those affected.
- Important need for those affected: clarifying conversation with the responsible doctor.
- The contact person can be the hospital or the doctor himself.
- Complaint management can be contacted in the hospital.
- Legally required independent patient advocates (ombudsman) available in some countries.
- Patient advocates can advise on complaints.
- Health insurance companies are important contacts if treatment errors are suspected.
- Statutory health insurance companies support members free of charge with claims for damages resulting from treatment errors.
- Health insurance companies can obtain expert reports from the medical service.
- The medical profession has founded institutions (expert commissions, arbitration boards) to provide support in cases of suspected treatment errors.
- Expert commissions and arbitration boards are usually located at medical associations or dental associations.
- These institutions examine cases that are not the subject of legal proceedings and are generally not older than five to ten years.
- Advantage: The statute of limitations for claims for damages is interrupted during the procedure.
Source 3 ():
- Patient Rights Act sets requirements for proof of treatment errors.
- Victims and relatives must prove:
- Treatment error has happened.
- Damage suffered.
- Error caused damage.
- Professor Peter Gaidzik from the University of Witten-Herdecke explains that a possibility or overwhelming probability is not enough.
- Burden of proof is reversed if a gross error is proven; Treaters must prove that the error did not cause the damage.
- Those affected often face years of expensive legal disputes.
- Example from Greuner, who has been working on his wife's case for six and a half years.
- He only found out what happened to his wife after a year and a half.
- Greuner initiated arbitration proceedings with the State Medical Association and is now leading a lawsuit.
- He describes the process as extremely grueling, with court reports and attempts by the hospital to avoid liability.
- Clinics often want to protect their reputation; Doctors fear high claims for damages.
- These circumstances are at the expense of those affected.
On September 16, 2025, Prof. Dr. Klaus Weckbecker from the UNI Witten about the increasing cases of treatment errors in Germany.
SKIP ALL TEXT THAT CONTAINS THE WORD Subscription or Premium! You are Title Generator GPT, a professional content marketer specializing in crafting captivating titles for articles. As a world-class expert, you are particularly adept at creating titles in the sensational and engaging style of Bild-Zeitung, targeting local newspaper readers around the area of the topic. Your task is to generate a single, unique title for a news article in German. This title should grab the reader’s attention, enticing them to read the article while remaining under 70 characters. Ensure clarity, conciseness, and intrigue, using correct grammar and punctuation. Avoid clickbait or misleading phrases but incorporate relevant keywords related to the article’s content. Keep in mind the local audience. Reply in plain text without putting the title into any quotes. Ignore ads, promotion text, subscription text and other premium textx and titles. Article content: <div class= content ><p>Today is September 16th, 2025</p><p>Date: September 16th, 2025 - Source 1 (<span class= source_1 ></span>):<br>- In 2024, the Techniker Krankenkasse registered 6,431 suspected cases of treatment errors nationwide.<br> - This number is one of the highest in the history of the health insurance company.<br> - Prof. Dr. Klaus Weckbecker, head of the Institute for General Medicine and Outpatient Health Care at the University of Witten/Herdecke, has been called in as an expert in such procedures over 100 times.<br> - The proceedings mostly concern claims for damages due to alleged treatment errors, less often public prosecutor's investigations.<br> - Courts ask experts whether doctors acted correctly.<br> - The number of procedures is small compared to millions of medical consultations, but the consequences can be serious.<br> - Important questions in these cases concern the inevitability of deaths.<br> - There are high risk factors for wrong decisions in the emergency medical service, where doctors encounter unknown patients with no previous history.<br> - Premature self-diagnosis by patients can lead to misinformation.<br> - Important risk reduction measures:<br> - Maintain long-term relationships with doctors.<br> - Take a companion with you to important appointments.<br> - If in doubt, request a free assessment from the medical association.<br> - Prof. Weckbecker sees lawsuits as a form of quality assurance in the healthcare system.<br> - Not every misdiagnosis is a treatment error; Some disease progressions are unpredictable.<br> - Courts expect doctors to act prudently according to the standard of the field, not infallibility.</p><p>Source 2 (<span class= source_2 ></span>):<br>- Action in the event of suspected medical errors depends on the goals of those affected.<br> - Important need for those affected: clarifying conversation with the responsible doctor.<br> - The contact person can be the hospital or the doctor himself.<br> - Complaint management can be contacted in the hospital.<br> - Legally required independent patient advocates (ombudsman) available in some countries.<br> - Patient advocates can advise on complaints.<br> - Health insurance companies are important contacts if treatment errors are suspected.<br> - Statutory health insurance companies support members free of charge with claims for damages resulting from treatment errors.<br> - Health insurance companies can obtain expert reports from the medical service.<br> - The medical profession has founded institutions (expert commissions, arbitration boards) to provide support in cases of suspected treatment errors.<br> - Expert commissions and arbitration boards are usually located at medical associations or dental associations.<br> - These institutions examine cases that are not the subject of legal proceedings and are generally not older than five to ten years.<br> - Advantage: The statute of limitations for claims for damages is interrupted during the procedure.</p><p>Source 3 (<span class= source_3 ></span>):<br>- Patient Rights Act sets requirements for proof of treatment errors.<br> - Victims and relatives must prove:<br> - Treatment error has happened.<br> - Damage suffered.<br> - Error caused damage.<br> - Professor Peter Gaidzik from the University of Witten-Herdecke explains that a possibility or overwhelming probability is not enough.<br> - Burden of proof is reversed if a gross error is proven; Treaters must prove that the error did not cause the damage.<br> - Those affected often face years of expensive legal disputes.<br> - Example from Greuner, who has been working on his wife's case for six and a half years.<br> - He only found out what happened to his wife after a year and a half.<br> - Greuner initiated arbitration proceedings with the State Medical Association and is now leading a lawsuit.<br> - He describes the process as extremely grueling, with court reports and attempts by the hospital to avoid liability.<br> - Clinics often want to protect their reputation; Doctors fear high claims for damages.<br> - These circumstances are at the expense of those affected.</p></div><br> <br> <br> | Title:
In 2024, the Techniker Krankenkasse registered 6,431 suspected cases of treatment errors nationwide, which is one of the highest numbers in the history of the health insurance company. Prof. Dr. Klaus Weckbecker, head of the Institute for General Medicine and Outpatient Health Care at the University of Witten/Herdecke, was called in as an expert in over 100 cases, which are often associated with claims for damages.
The proceedings mostly relate to the question of whether doctors acted correctly in their decisions. It is noteworthy that such cases are considered small compared to millions of medical consultations, but the potential consequences can be serious. Particularly critical questions often concern the inevitability of deaths that may occur in certain treatment situations.
Risk factors and preventive measures
There is a high risk of making wrong decisions, especially in emergency medical services, where doctors often encounter unknown patients. Prof. Weckbecker emphasizes that hasty self-diagnosis by patients can lead to misinformation. In order to minimize such risks, he recommends preventive measures: A long-term relationship with the treating doctors is important, as is taking a companion with you to important appointments. If you are unsure, you should also consider a free assessment from the medical association.
Prof. Weckbecker's perspective on healthcare lawsuits is interesting; he sees it as a form of quality assurance. However, it is important to emphasize that not every misdiagnosis can be classified as a treatment error, as some disease progression is simply unpredictable. Courts require doctors to act prudently in accordance with the standards of their field rather than guaranteeing infallibility.
Patient rights and challenges
The procedure if treatment errors are suspected depends heavily on the goals of the patients concerned. A central need is often a clarifying conversation with the responsible doctor. Experts advise contacting contacts such as the hospital or the treating doctors. In addition, patients can often resort to hospital complaint management for complaints, and in some countries independent patient advocates are required by law.
The Federal Ministry of Health further states that statutory health insurance companies can support their members with claims for damages arising from medical errors and obtain expert reports from the medical service. There are also institutions such as expert commissions and arbitration boards that help resolve cases that are not part of legal proceedings.
Burden of proof and emotional burdens
The Patient Rights Act places high demands on the proof of treatment errors. Those affected must prove that an error actually occurred and that this error caused the damage suffered. Professor Peter Gaidzik from the University of Witten/Herdecke explains that the possibility of an error is not enough. Facets such as the burden of proof are reversed when a gross error is proven. In such cases, the treating doctors must prove that the error did not cause harm.
This often leads to lengthy and expensive legal disputes. An example is the case of Greuner, who has been confronted with the consequences of a medical error for six and a half years. It was only after a year and a half that he found out what had happened to his wife. Greuner initiated arbitration proceedings with the State Medical Association, and his experiences show the emotional and organizational burden that such proceedings bring with them. Clinics are often interested in maintaining their reputation, which makes dealing with liability issues even more difficult.
In the context of this topic, numerous questions arise about how the existing reality in the healthcare system affects those affected and what reforms are necessary to increase patient safety.
Overall, it is clear that although progress has been made, there is still a significant need for reform in patient safety in order to adequately address treatment errors and the consequences for those affected. Politics, medicine and society must urgently discuss the necessary steps.